Monday, April 5, 2010

Oyster River Shool District audit shows room for improvement in school record keeping; policies

DURHAM — An audit of the 2009 budget revealed the Oyster River School District could make some improvements to its record keeping and policies.

Melanson Heath & Company of Nashua recently conducted the audit.

A brief report of findings by the company states the district should improve controls over disbursements. During a sample testing of 25 vendor disbursements, three items did not have documentation or department head approval and supporting vendor invoices could not be located for three others.

"These situations increase the risk that errors or irregularities could occur and go undetected," the report states.

The report also recommends the district should implement regular department internal audits.

Such audits would include reviewing cash receipt monitoring, petty cash handling and student activity records.

"We recommend the district establish a schedule for periodic internal audits of department accounting records," the report states. "This will result in improved oversight and should reduce the risk of errors or irregularities occurring and going undetected."

As part of the internal audit recommendation, the district should also develop a more formal risk assessment, according to the report.

A risk assessment would allow the district to identify where it may be vulnerable to errors or irregularities. The report goes on to say that once these vulnerabilities are identified, the district could then document them, along with a description on how it intends to respond to the risks.

It's also recommended that the district establish a more formal disaster recovery plan for its computer system.

District Business Administrator Blaine Cox said most of the issues raised in the audit are subtle changes the district can address.

He said the district double checks all invoices and the missing invoices cited in the report were likely misplaced during filing.

"We know from our process that there's no way any invoice is missing," he said. "It's just a matter of filing. We need a more foolproof way of filing."

The invoices without department head approval were monthly bills that automatically get paid each month, he said. He said the district would make sure it has department head approval on these bills in the future.

Cox said the district also conducts internal audits, but not at the frequency that auditors are recommending. He said the district would be looking to do internal audits on a more regular basis.

The district also does risk assessment and has a disaster recovery plan, but neither is documented, according to Cox.

5 comments:

  1. Dear Members of the School Board:

    I went to the website with interest to see the minutes from the school board workshop held last week. What I found was appalling. In a meeting that lasted 2 1/2 hours, nothing was recorded (see "minutes" below). This was a public meeting and not only are these "minutes" inadequate and unacceptable, but they are non-compliant with RSA 91-A.

    Our District should not only be complying with the minimum set by law, but raising the standard to ensure that the public has a solid understanding of topics being discussed. (Please take note of the minutes submitted by the Long Range Planning Committee and the Strategic Planning Committee).

    I formally request that the Chair add a discussion item to the next agenda for the Board to address the lack of quality and detail in school board committee/special meeting minutes. Members of the public should be able to read the minutes to know what topics are being discussed and some of the content of that discussion.

    Members of the public are demanding accountability, communication and transparency. This is yet another example of the District's disregard for the public.

    Sincerely,
    Jenna Roberts

    Cc: Town of Durham, Town of Lee, Town of Madbury


    Here are the minutes that I cut and pasted from the District website:
    __________________________________________________________________________

    Minutes
    School Board Workshop
    Oyster River Cooperative School District
    24 March 2010

    Members Present: Mark Townsend, Henry Brackett, Ann Wright, Krista Butts, JoAnn Portalupi, Jennifer Rief, and by phone – Jocelyn O’Quinn, who was away.

    Also Present: Blaine Cox and Howard Colter

    Mark Townsend called the workshop to order at 7:37 PM.

    Mark Townsend adjourned the training session at 10:05 PM


    Howard Colter
    Rercorder

    __________________________________________________________________________


    TITLE VI
    PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES

    CHAPTER 91-A
    ACCESS TO GOVERNMENTAL RECORDS AND MEETINGS

    II. Subject to the provisions of RSA 91-A:3, all meetings, whether held in person, by means of telephone or electronic communication, or in any other manner, shall be open to the public...

    Minutes of all such meetings, including names of members, persons appearing before the public bodies, and a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions, shall be promptly recorded and open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Quote: "We know from our process that there's no way any invoice is missing," he said. "It's just a matter of filing. We need a more foolproof way of filing."

    News flash, Cox: in the real world, if you can’t justify 25% of your purchases, there’s something wrong with your process. That’s not a problem with “filing”; that’s a problem with basic competence.

    Typical bureaucratic mindset: “Our process is just fine; the results don’t matter.” That’s why if you work for the government you can totally f*** everything up and still keep your job.

    Here is the auditors report, in plain English: "The District's finance and accounting paperwork is kept in a shoebox. A dishonest vendor or rogue employee could be robbing you blind; your records are so piss-poor we can’t tell.”

    So, are we to believe that administrators who can't handle "filing" are capable of managing a $38 million dollar budget?

    And when the documentation justifying purchases happens to go missing, we're supposed to take their word that everything is on the up and up?

    I say the School Board should do what they did in Newmarket: bring in an audit team and let ‘em go through everything. We can’t trust these idiots.

    I’d bet dollars to donuts that what they’d find would blow the doors off the SAU building. And Blaine Cox would get fired, go to Washington and get a job with the Obama administration.

    But it ain’t gonna happen, folks…our School Board doesn’t have the backbone to ask the administration to wipe their feet at the door, never mind question the way they do business.

    All the talk of “change”, “accountability”, “transparency” and the like during the last election was pure bulls***. They’ll say anything to get elected; once their butts hit the chairs in the committee room they become nothing more than a rubber stamp for the administration and unions, who keep spending our money like drunken sailors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here is a summary based on the audit reports I could find on the school website. Fy08 and Fy09 were missing.

    Findings listed in audits for fy04-fy07:

    Audits were conducted by Plodzik & Sanderson for those 4 years
    Every audit, every year had "significant deficiencies"


    FY04:
    significant deficiencies related to:
    student activity fund
    net cash resources

    FY05:
    significant deficiences related to:
    student activity fund
    Special Ed Cluster
    late filing of quarterly reports

    FY06:
    significant deficiences related to:
    student acticity fund
    Special Ed Cluster
    late filing of quarterly reports
    reconciliation of payroll

    FY07:
    significant deficiences related to:
    student acticity fund
    Special Ed Cluster
    late filing of quarterly reports
    reconciliation of payroll

    ReplyDelete
  4. How can the public demand that things are handled properly? Is there a grievance procedure in place? Oh silly me, nothing like that could possibly have been created during the Taylor/Portalupi tenure.

    Maybe this explains why Cox had an unprecedented three year contract rushed through last year. They could see that the tides were changing & the public was FINALLY paying attention.

    ReplyDelete
  5. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PLACE? If you did not see the school board meeting tonight, I suggest not watching it unless you want to kick a hole into the front of your tv. I hurt my foot...

    ReplyDelete