I've decided to turn off the Anonymous comments. It seems as if the community has vented and the comments then descended into blame, petty arguments, and mudslinging. If you would like to post anything, you are all welcome to do so, however, you need to register for a Google ID. It is a free and painless process. The link is here:
Create a Google Account
Also, Fosters wrote an article regarding last nights meeting. The text is below.
Article published Apr 14, 2011
Failure to select Oyster River principal draws public fury
DURHAM — Students, teachers and parents have called the rejection of the nomination for a new high school principal "shocking" and are upset with the School Board's response to its decision.
As Durham police patrolled the parking lot and school hallways as a precaution, about 60 community members filled the meeting room, talking about why they were angry with the School Board.
Others who could not find a seat sat in the hallway watching the meeting on televisions.
"You screwed these kids the other night, " said resident John Collins during public comment. "You screwed them."
Echoing the response of other community members, parents and students who were present, Collins said he was unhappy the School Board had not chosen a permanent principal to replace Laura Rogers, who will be leaving at the end of the year.
Since mid-February, the 15 members of the high school principal search committee sifted through 44 applications, narrowing the field down to two final candidates, Justin Campbell and Robert Thompson.
Campbell is the director of academic studies at Milford High School and Thompson is currently the dean of students at Souhegan High School in Amherst.
At Monday's School Board meeting, both candidates responded to questions from school board members. The meeting then went into a nonpublic session where board members heard Superintendent Howard Colter nominate his preferred candidate, Campbell, to fill the open position.
He said he made his decision based on Campbell's teaching background, past administrative experience and that he was currently working on his doctorate at the University of New Hampshire.
"Both our candidates were outstanding," Colter said. "But you pick the person you think is the best fit, and I felt that Justin's teaching background, education and experiences as administrator gave him a bit."
However, board members voted 4-3 against the nomination, with members James Kach, Megan Turnbull, Ann Lane and Jocelyn O'Quinn voting in the majority.
Henry Brackett, Krista Butts, and Anne Wright supported Colter's nomination.
Julie Reece, who worked on the search committee, said the group was not given any formal criteria on how to select a candidate. Members met and discussed what would make a good principal and they came up with questions for interviews.
She said she was shocked when she learned neither candidate was chosen.
"They were in nonpublic for over an hour and when they came back, it was apparent things hadn't gone the way we had anticipated," she said.
The committee has not learned what, if any, steps it will need to take to continue a search for a new principal.
During Wednesday's meeting, board members went into a 10-minute nonpublic session to discuss what they wanted to make for a public statement. After returning to the meeting, members discussed at length how they wanted to word their public statement about Monday night's decision.
With a previously written statement by O'Quinn, members said they made their decision by considering the "pending state budget" and the superintendent's departure in 2012.
Members also said they did not receive enough time to consider the candidates during Monday's meeting because Colter had immediately announced his nomination during the nonpublic session.
Community members were allowed a second time to speak before the board.
Many claimed the board was trying to do "damage control" and were "throwing Colter under the bus" as an excuse for its decision. Others said they are disappointed the board was citing possible future budget constraints as a reason for not hiring a principal.
ORHS junior Riley Maynard, who signed the "We Need A Principal" sign that hung in the meeting room, said she was upset the board had not listened to the students who wanted Campbell to become principal.
"We knew who we wanted," she said. "The two guys were incredible, but once it got to the School Board, it got shut down. It was disappointing."
Maynard said she doesn't expect the candidates to come back before the board, but would like to know why there was no explanation for the rejected nomination.
"If we could have a permanent principal, why wouldn't we?" she asked.
Other students have said they want answers, not to hear the board blame Colter for not nominating a second candidate. Many students at the meeting said they are planning a walkout Thursday morning in response to not hearing answers from board members.
"I felt very proud of the students coming out here and speaking up," said state Rep. Jenna Roberts, D-Durham, after the meeting. "Clearly people want to get things off their chest."
School Board Student Representative Cody Jacobsen said after the meeting that he did not think the board was giving the community an answer that was sufficient.
"Frankly, I don't see any reason why they should wait until April 27," he said. "They aren't going to hear anything from Concord by then."
The School Board plans to discuss the impact of the decision at its April 27 meeting and to talk about what is the next step for the district to fill the position.
Thank you, anon has it's benefits until it starts being abused. You gave the community another chance, which is very good of you.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the Foster's article, where was the reporter? I sure would have liked to have said a few things as one of MANY who are on the other side of the coin.
I am reminded, media is about selling papers. So whether they write about situations correctly ~ or not ~ it's irrelevant as witnessed by some of the members of our community mentioned in that article who have publically been misrepresented/quoted on the front pages.
As has been spoken to on the blog by those individuals, I do agree that journalism should be taken with a boat load of salt because it is no longer a vehicle of integrity.
Oh we keep hearing about RESPECT, CIVILITY....so let's check out this youtube video posted by a former school board member.
ReplyDeleteIn the first few seconds you can hear the comment 'GET THEIR ADDRESSES, GET IN THEIR HOMES'.
Seriously, WTF??? Adults in leadership positions are now inciting violence and/or criminal violence.
BEYOND IRRSPONSIBLE AND DISGUSTING.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IksSckkod4#
Forgot to mention, several of those school board members are MOTHERS WITH TODDLERS OR VERY SMALL CHILDREN.
ReplyDeleteI cannot believe my eyes. Regardless of who spoke those words, the former school board member posted it.
Hi ChrisAnn,
ReplyDeleteI don't think that making comments on a blog will have as much of an effect on the community nor will it truly show your support of the school board. You should consider actually speaking at the next meeting instead of just sitting and expressing your disgust in blog responses to the displays of community and school pride by the students.
I also think that the comment in the video posted by a former board member who is a very respectable and kind member of the durham community for over 20 years has been greatly taken out of context.
To assume that students would go to the homes of board members and be VIOLENT as implied in your above statment is a horrendous miscalculation of the students, what they value, and their parents. I can only imagine since you do not yet have children in the Oyster River High School you do not understand what a kind and respectful environment it is.
I suggest that as you have said many times you stop attacking the community who is against the school board, the former board members, the members of the search committee and have some respect and the decency to speak in front of the school board. I have a great respect for you for speaking your mind, and I am sure that you only have your childrens best intrests at heart, but I would suggest that you stop attacking community members and students as a show of respect, the same respect that you are demanding. I have not commented before but I feel as if some of the comments that are being made are disrespectful, and I will not be responding to any retribution you feel necassary. I hope you will have an open mind, and that the community wil hear your opinion and support for the School Boards decision on April 27th.
Thank you.
It appears my earlier comment was removed…I will repost it because I believe what I have to say is important, and because there was nothing confidential revealed and it was nothing but respectful. On the bright side, I did get to revise! If it is removed again I suppose I will just have to keep reposting it.
ReplyDeleteDear ChrisAnn,
You seemed like a very involved, very eager member of the community. Because of this I was surprised to read that you had been at the school board meeting April 13th, but choose not to stand up and express the opinions you so vehemently preach on this blog. This is not an insult, but I truly believe it would be more effective to your cause to actually speak up in support of the board at the next meeting on April 27th, instead of expressing your disgust the next day on this blog regarding the communities passion, and the students school pride.
I also believe it would be greatly beneficial to fixing the conflict that has been caused by this issue, if you would stop attacking and targeting, the superintendent, former board members, the search committee, students, and those not in support of the school board. It is especially disrespectful to single them out, no not by name, but by angling at who they are so intensely you would have to live under a rock not to get who you were talking about. As you have said many times, we need to respect the school board. I would also like to ask that you respect those who are involved in protest.
I would also like to address the above post regarding the statement made in the you tube video.
1.) The former board member (who has been a kind and respectful member of the Durham community for the past 20 years) did not make the disparaging comment, and posting a you tube video is not supporting violence.
2.) The comment made did not include any sort of violent threat. Any sane human being would believe this implied writing letters ect. Not threatening to kill board members.
3.) The fact that you believe that the students of Oyster River High School would participate in violence toward board members (as implied by your statement of their toddlers and children which I can only imagine you meant that there would be a risk of harm to them) is a gross miscalculation of the students. I can only imagine you do not have children in the High School Level or else you would understand how ludicrous that statement sounds about a high school whose environment is overwhelmingly kind and respectful.
I can only imagine that you are looking out for your child, and I do have a lot of respect fr you for speaking your mind. I just ask that you extend the same courtesy to the community you have been attacking, as you requested for the board members.
We all hope to see you at the next board meeting on April 27th and hope that you will actually get up, give your opinion and support the board members this time. Publically.
Thank you.
Jane, Really, there is no need for anyone to make comments that imply violence--intended or not. Saying-"get their addresses, get in their homes"-does not make me think to write a letter. This is not funny and not to be taken lightly, ever.
ReplyDeleteJohn Collins apologized on the blog for saying it but since he said it and David Taylor posted it, they should both apologize. It is the adults who are acting immature here, the high school students have more sense than the parents. This is totally irresponsible and not even a little bit funny.
As for your criticism of ChrisAnn, she can speak up and out any way she sees fit or comfortable to do so. Who are you to tell her that she has to stand up in front of a mic to speak her mind, what, so you can scrutinize her and single out a "supporter". You have outed yourself as an adult and not a student.
I do not see you posting your name and you speaking "publically".
Time to raise the bar for the adults in this community. You are raising children and should try to set an example for the students, not serve as "what not to do."
"Jane",
ReplyDeleteSo many things to address, this response will be lengthy. I will try to be orderly about it
#1 speaking at the school board meeting~ public speaking is WAY out of my comfort zone, whether there is a bunch of angry kids present, or a mouse in the corner an otherwise an empty room. I am quite vocal via the blog, friends within the community and surrounding communities~ but more importantly there is not a thought shared here I have not also addressed to both Howard and the school board members.
#2 I find it insulting that you view my voicing my concerns as some sort of attack. I expect that people hired for the public have a thicker skin than that, and that simply voicing an opinion that does not agree with you or another, does not equal an attack. Perspective is important. Many of those I have disagreed with I know personally, they can contact me directly and/or respond directly if they have issue with my comments. I also believe them to be able to separate the issue from the person. I disagree greatly with a particular board member. If she feels disrespected by my disagreement I can’t help her response except to ask her to address exactly how I disrespected her. I have always been polite in my exchanges with her. Again, if disagreeing is equal to disrespect, than we are all in a boat of hurt because there is a lot of disagreement in our community.
#3 to specifically elaborate on #2, I mention Howard directly as he is a paid employee of our district and the one in charge. If I had a problem with Coca Cola, and made my opinions known of said president of the company, I sincerely doubt I would be labeled as disrespectful of him/her. I’ve spoken to Howard many times, including issues with my own children unrelated to the current drama. My opinion of him as a person is separate from the issues in leadership I have seen the past few months. I also think Howard has a thick enough skin to take criticism and/or contact me directly if he feels I have in some way wronged him. After all, my address and phone number is at the bottom of most of my communications to him and the school board.
Cont' II
ReplyDelete#4 The former members of the school board, one of which publicly discussed his involvement and regret of the comments in the video, are known leaders in the community. They know they are going to get held to a higher standard than the average citizen. Their direct involvement in the process clearly demonstrates that they could be a positive, educational force in the REALITY of the situation. Instead of inciting the incorrect assumption that the board can actually answer the students presently, I hope to see them change their direction and actually inform the students better. State Rep Jenna Roberts was in attendance Wednesday, explaining some of the layers of laws that are the agitating factor in the current situation. These students had NO IDEA that board couldn’t respond legally. Shame on the adults involved for not correctly informing the students. [if that is an ‘attack’ then I can’t help you, I won’t dance behind big words or assumptions ~ some things have to be plainly said]
#5 I don’t have a crystal ball and I assume you don’t either. You can’t forecast what a statement like that can incite anymore than I can. Personally, I lived in Denver for several years. I worked closely with a mother of a Columbine victim. I know personally that she will go to her grave wishing she had taken a stand at her ordinary town’s school, ordinary school conflicts, and extraordinary tragic event. After all, her child just went to the library one day. She desperately wishes she stood up and took more seriously the snobbery, elitism, incivility, bullying, and parental detachment that took place. While I am not attempting to say that the video comment is going to incite ‘the next Columbine’, I am sharing personal information with the community that NONE of us knows for any definite fact where the next one could be and I believe in my heart of hearts that adults in positions of authority or admiration need to hold themselves to the utmost standard in their demeanor and behavior. They hold a place of honor in students’ lives and should emulate the best of social behavior.
#6 Teenagers. You don’t know me and neither does the majority of the community. You don’t know I have a step child [who I put in summer camps in the community of Columbine High School] who is a junior at a local high school. I have a large number of nieces and nephews who attend local high schools and with who I am clearly and definitely a big part of their lives for reasons that are private as well as familial. You don’t know whom my related teenagers know/date/befriend/associate or participate with at ORHS or activities outside of our tri-town area. While the children I gave birth to are not yet attending, to assume I am not ‘sane’ because I can’t see how teenagers would take the comment ~ well that is ridiculous as well as libelous as I know very well about teenagers. I understand how their environment and social climate feels to them. I know their jargon, their humor, how much their hearts break with disappointment. I also know their natural immaturity, their tendency to follow their peer group [rightly or wrongly], their general distrust of parents and visibly detached adults in authority [as the school board must seem to them], and their lack of life experience and how that factors into their current perspective which can often lead to regrets in their future. Perhaps my expectations of behavior are not the same as yours or others, fair enough, but I won’t apologize for setting a high standard that I know can be met.
Cont' III
ReplyDelete#7 Current Politics ~ this is a tough time. While I have clear opinions about many issues, there are some I do not. Given the inane nature of both State & Federal government currently, I believe whole-heartedly that the best results come from an involvement of the most varied input. Diversity is the key to growth, exploration, and intelligent discussion.
#8 Ignorance that only the current students, faculty, or staff of the high school can possibly understand the needs, concerns, and/or issues within the ORHS. That anyone else can truly see or have a valid opinion, or have any right to claim or own the school, it’s contents, it’s curriculum as so forth~ astounds me. I adore Moharimet Elementary. Through my children, stepchild, nieces and nephews I am intimately familiar with about a dozen elementary schools. My hat is off to Mr. Harrington and his faculty/staff. Now, saying this, I truly expect ‘outsiders’ to see what they see, feel how they feel, voice what they voice with as much validity as my experiences. No school operates on an island or inside a bubble and this attitude~ that I have personally experienced by faculty of the high school ~ of the communities ignorance of issues and unwelcome ness of input from parents is deeply troubling.
This post is way too long. If I’ve missed something, let me know.
I appreciate the chance to clarify myself.
I'm just curious. The article cited "60 community members" but the majority of the ones interviewed were students.
ReplyDeleteAt what point does a student become a community member in terms of taking up time at public meetings?
The SB should consider more carefully defining what this means. I agree that many HS students are indeed informed, articulate and thoughtful. However many are not. More importantly, they do not have legal standing yet as "community members" unless they are 18. My seven year old is also a "community member", but I wouldn't expect him to be able to speak at a public meeting.
The SB is elected by the voters of the Lee, Madbury & Durham to represent the interests of the voters, NOT the interests of the students. If the students feel so deeply about this they should convince their parents (who are voters) to represent their concerns until they are of legal age.
@ Mary, ROCK ON !!!
ReplyDeleteHello,
ReplyDeleteJust a quick point of clarification in regards to the Foster's article. I was critiquing the press coverage of yesterday's walkout with my journalism classes today. The article says that faculty and staff were driving by the walkout honking horns to show their support. I asked students if any of them at the walkout had observed this. All of them said they hadn't. In talking with other faculty here it seems that this observation by the reporter is completely false. (For the sake of honesty - I did drive by the walkout on my way back from downtown where I was picking up breakfast for one of my classes. I did not honk.)
My concern is that this error in the press coverage will be interpreted to say that the faculty and staff here were: a - actively condoning the walkout and/or b - driving around honking their horns in support. Neither of which, to my knowledge are true.
I read the blog and post occassionally just to respond to facts and to provide a teacher's perspective. I hope that anything I say will be taken into consideration, and not used to add fuel to the fire.
ChrisAnn- I appreciate your comments regarding John's apology on the other thread. I do feel the need to point out that your comment here misquotes John's comment on the video in a very important way. Brian Turnbull got it right on the other thread. What he did say was "Get their addresses. Go to their homes", using body language suggesting to continue the peaceful demonstration down the road. Also, it was clear to the students (this has been verified), that it was a joke. The laughter from the students also verifies this. Also, it was only heard by and addressed to a very few students, NOT the entire demonstartion as has been suggested on this blog. I've made it clear that I don't approve of the comments, even in jest, but if people want to be publicaly critical, they should be sure to be criticizing the actual event and the actual words. ChrisAnn, I realize you were angry when you wrote the above post I'm refering to, but the conclusions you draw in it from the misquote serve to distort and further inflame. 'Mary' then misquoted it again in her post, taking the lead from you. I would just ask that more care be used all around.
ReplyDeletePosted this earlier, but it disappeared.
ReplyDeleteChrisAnn- I appreciate your comments regarding John's apology on the other thread. I do feel the need to point out that your comment here misquotes John's comment on the video in a very important way. Brian Turnbull got it right on the other thread. What he did say was "Get their addresses. Go to their homes", using body language suggesting to continue the peaceful demonstration down the road. Also, it was clear to the students (this has been verified), that it was a joke. The laughter from the students also verifies this. Also, it was only heard by and addressed to a very few students, NOT the entire demonstartion as has been suggested on this blog. I've made it clear that I don't approve of the comments, even in jest, but if people want to be publicaly critical, they should be sure to be criticizing the actual event and the actual words. ChrisAnn, I realize you were angry when you wrote the above post I'm refering to, but the conclusions you draw in it from the misquote serve to distort and further inflame. 'Mary' then misquoted it again in her post, taking the lead from you. I would just ask that more care be used all around.